About Time (2013)
If you were to ask the casual film-viewer what their thoughts are as to what is ultimately hampering the romantic-comedy these days, odds are they’d reply that their premises, unfurling of events, and happy-go-lucky nature aren’t very realistic, therefore supremely disengaging. Put in layman’s terms, almost everything about them is far fetched which renders their message, their point, their reason for simply being inert and unattainable. The rom-com used to be and should still be one of the most elemental, down-to-earth, and audience compatible genres. Yet nowadays, it seems that every week another cold, forced, and faceless piece of less-than-romantic, unfunny drivel is released. To make matters worse, the dialogue is contrived and overly gooey, and the characters either come off as pretentious, act un-rightfully entitled, or are just plain out loaded…in other words, they’re nothing more than couple of spineless, snobby saps unworthy of your time. Thankfully however, “About Time” is none of the sort.
Now, what’s quite ironic is that this aforementioned general opinion regarding the genre is itself fairly contrived, more just going with the flow instead of forming personal opinions…but there is a method to this madness. I mean, you used to go into the theatre to see a rom-com and be fairly sure that this, your dark, lonely existence would be illuminated…at the very least dimly lit by the opportunity, the chance at something with purpose. You know, something that would make the remainder of your days meaningful, bearable. Why? you ask. Well let’s face it, the honest truth is that this short span of time we have is extremely disheartening and the only thing that lights up our brief days is love, in its many transcendent forms. Today, you’re lucky if 10% of rom-com flicks are superb enough to evoke such a reaction and the rest miraculously flop, predictably.
I know that some of you are married or have significant others, and even kids, so the previous rant might not apply to you. If this is the case, just smirk condescendingly at my vulnerability…but I digress. Look, if I’m to be honest with you, my readers whom I adore endlessly. Recently I had given up on the big “L” word and the genre entirely (neither had anything to do with my dismissal of the other). The last rom-com that I can confidently say I swept me off my feet was “Wedding Crashers,” so yeah, it’s been a while. This year however, I’m feeling slightly more optimistic, I’m still, slightly young so there’s still time to turn everything around, and it just so happens that two of my favourite films of the year are romantic-comedies, those being “Drinking Buddies” and the one I’m about to review, “About Time,” a good sign for my progression if you ask me (optimism). However, this being said, my previous statements about the genre still remain prominent and true. With the exception of a few here and there, the genre is suffering…but this debate is for another day.
To switch things up rather abruptly, here’s a peeve of mine I hope you reflect. Don’t you hate it when a film’s marketing doesn’t do it justice or presents the flick itself incorrectly? This common, grave error occurs all too often and essentially leads to misinterpretations, bad auras, and critic negativity…you know, absorption misconceptions. A few off the top of my head, “Only God Forgives,” “On the Road,” and “The Counselor” just to name a few. Why I bring this up is because I fear that “About Time” was branded all wrong and that it’ll be misunderstood and underrated as a result…a thought my buddy brought up upon exiting the theatre that I had swirling around my head throughout its runtime that I agreed with.
To go even further off topic, did you know I went to the same university as “About Time” star Rachel McAdams, just a few years after she graduated? And Malin Akerman, but that’s besides the point. Doesn’t that suck? Here I am sitting alone, when I could be married to my ultimate crush had I been born just a few years earlier. Wow, this review got sidetracked in a hurry, let’s get back to the film.
There are few who know love as well as Richard Curtis, and even fewer who can execute it to such an effective degree on the big screen. Director of “Love, Actually,” and scribe of “Notting Hill,” just to rattle off a few of his most notable rom-coms, Curtis is one of the most talented and perennial minds the genre has ever known. He continues down this road he has long trotted and helped solidify with another piece of solid gold containing such mesmerizing humanity and willing vulnerability that it rivals even his most accomplished outing, whatever you feel that may be.
Following a quirky, romantic lawyer who has the ability to time travel to any moment in the past and change whatever he wishes. “About Time” might not be Curtis’ most original piece, but is definitely the most inventive, funny, and emotionally relentless he’s ever conjured, in my opinion anyway. Granted, the story’s structure and premise is nothing you haven’t seen or heard before, but try not to focus on the weary ploy of a lonesome time-traveler. What is most mesmerizing, astounding, and rewarding about this flick doesn’t have to do with the story or thematic retread, but rather what Curtis accomplishes and evokes with it. There is only one other filmmaker (Drake Doremus) I know of that can capture those subtle, minuscule movements and glances that exude true happiness, sadness, and disheartening realizations as well as Curtis does here. For just his third feature behind the camera, Curtis shows the talent of a wily veteran. Regardless if you’re a fan of his work, a cinephile, or just becoming aquatinted, this is a must see.
What’s even more important than having an invested, well-versed overseer conducting and directing the flow is a cast with chemistry, charisma, and honesty. Starring the lovely Rachel Mcadams, the immensely talented Bill Nighy, and sky-rocketing up-and-comer Domhnall Gleeson, it’s fair to say that “About Time” is formidable across the board. Gleeson, although remarkably skilled, still managed to stun me with his performance. The vast spectrum and depth of the emotions he portrays is decidedly accurate and plain-out staggering. You’ll be hard-pressed to find a more authentic, driven performance this year. Nighy, who still flies unnecessarily under the radar here in North America, adds another flawless undertaking to his already stellar resume. Finally, the always radiant Rachel McAdams has somehow managed to leave me breathless once again. I’d love to go into more detail, but I don’t want to come off as a creep. All you need to know is that she delivers in every aspect…just stunning.
Nothing like the negativity you’ve probably read or heard and is anything but what you expected. “About Time” is, without question, one of the sleeper hits this year.
About Time: 8.5 out of 10.
Posted on November 14, 2013, in Rom-Com and tagged Comedy, Curtis, Doremus, Drama, Gleeson, McAdams, Nighy, Rom-com, Romance. Bookmark the permalink. 26 Comments.
Great review! The tangents work in it.😉
I can’t wait to see it so I can find out whether or not I agree with your positivity.
Thanks so much! Yeah, I’m a little overly sentimental when it comes to flicks like this, but I thought it was really well done, I think you’ll enjoy it.
I am too, actually. I love a good rom-com, and About Time looks incredibly promising.
Good review Joseph. It felt like it really could have gone somewhere, but at the end, it was just too sentimental for its own good.
Thanks! Completely get what you mean, I’m just a little wuss lol. This kind of shit always gets to me…
Nice work, Joseph – maybe I’ll watch this with the wife when it comes out to rent.
Thank you, good sir! You make it sound like a date night movie, make me feel even more like a baby lol.
LOL – no – these types of things is what the wife likes to watch – she doesn’t do my horror movies (I like them too but I don’t write about em)
You should write about this one, just so I can absorb your true feelings😉.
LOL – we’ll see how it goes : )
awwwwwwwwwwww yeaaaah. i know you loved this one. glad you added a lot of personal touches towards the beginning too. if only mcadams was obtainable.. for all of us lol
Lol, but I was sooooo close to her…just a few years off. I will never give up hope!
Wow, what an interesting review. I was very ready to give this one a miss because I despise the genre but you’ve made me rethink. Despite not being a fan of rom-coms I did enjoy Love Actually (probably mostly for the superb cast and the delightful writing) so I should watch this. If for nothing else than getting a closer look at our Domhnall.
Thanks! I’d recommend you don’t pass on this one, then again, if you’re not a fan of the genre, you might be impervious to its charms lol. Domhnall is phenomenal in it, so check it out if only for him😉.
I will do Joseph, cheers!
I love your thoughts on what makes the rom-com genre special. That often gets overlooked due to the large amount of slop out there, but yes, there is something essentially human about those fun, quirky romantic comedies.
Why thank you Jacob! Means a lot. Happy to hear you agree!
Great review. I particularly l enjoyed your discussion about the genre of rom-com. I have to say I’m not a fan but “Crazy, Stupid, Love” was a class film.
Thanks Chris! Yeah, also enjoyed Crazy, Stupid, Love. The genre has surprised me as of late, maybe it’s finally turning it around.
I thought it was a very lame, very cheesy romcom by the poster… thank god for film bloggers! Awesome review and I really want to see it now – 8.5 is something.😉
Well, it is kind of cheesy lol. I really liked it, so if that means anything to you, then by all means check it out.
Definitely😉 I trust your opinion all the way.
Great review! Hmm… I didn’t rush out to see this one in the cinema. Maybe I was wrong! Sounds pretty good. For a chick type flick.😉
How dare you? Are you inferring that I’m a chick? Lol. Definitely give it a watch, near impossible not to enjoy.
I agree with you on how poorly the marketing depicted this movie. The first thing I thought was “Oh, man I can’t believe Rachel McAdams signed on to do a blatant rip-off of The Time Traveller’s Wife”.
The other thing I like is that the lead actor isn’t some cookie cutter “Hollywood Hunk” leading man type. He’s different and quirky instead of muscle bound and dumb. And I appreciate that.
Completely agree, Gleeson is phenomenal and not what anyone would expect to be in a flick like this, making it all the more awesome.