TADFF 2013: We Are What We Are (2013)


To be completely honest, “We Are What We Are” raised some very intriguing arguments and I’d like to discuss that first.

In the recent past, here in the modern day, or our near future, It’s hard to imagine cannibalism providing anything but disgust and confusion to us. It may tweak our interest and pull at the strings of our curiosity from time to time, but nothing more has or will ever come of it. And you can bet that those, if any, who partake in the consumption of the human body came forth nowadays, they’d be met with the strongest punishment we, as a race with morals and compassion feel comfortable deploying, at the very least they’d be segregated.

The reason for this hatred has grown so quickly and vast, and with good reason. Apart from the fact that to accomplish this act, one must end another. The need for sustenance hasn’t been that significantly dire in the western world for as long as one can remember. So the need for such deplorable behaviour is really irrelevant nowadays and murdering someone for such unnecessary purposes is extremely frowned upon. This achievement, if you will, is directly correlated with our evolution as a species. Whether it be socially, politically, industrially, etc…


All this distancing and disgust being said, the question of our basic, elemental, natural survivalist instinct will always remain prominent. And as confident as we are that no matter how pressing the need to digest some form of physical intake is, we’d never resort to cannibalism…we simply cannot conclude this effectively. The truth is, none of us have been in a situation that calls for such drastic action, so how can any of us say that we’d never digest common flesh. While the film weaves its way through this subject briefly, what’s even more interesting is the more immediate topic “We Are What We Are” deals with, which is… What if cannibalism is all you’ve ever known? How would you feel participating in an act that is as normal to you as breathing? Director Jim Mickle’s take on these seemingly insane notions is the starting point for this terrific slow-burner. While it certainly isn’t the first, nor will it be the last to concoct a story around such a vile, yet nourishing act. It definitely captures the immensity, humanity, and seriousness of the subject.


A remake of Jorge Michel Grau’s film of the same title. This tense, impeccably acted  hybrid composed of horror, drama, and thriller is as heartfelt and astonishing as it is unsettling and menacing. It’d be very easy to lose one’s way in the gory, abhorrent, violent nature of cannibalism, especially when conjuring up a film that needs to satisfy those aspects. While “We Are What We Are” definitely meets these disturbing requirements, it’s quite remarkable how tasteful carnage and destruction can actually be. Yes, there are moments that’ll make you cringe and leave you a bit queasy. Nonetheless, when stacked up alongside the emotions, conflicts, and beautiful imagery, it’s nothing more than another cinematic tactic. This is due in large part to the experience and talent of the aforementioned Jim Mickle who directed this flick and screenplay scribe Nick Damichi. The duo do a sublime job separating their film from the filth and trivialness of other horror abortions.


Perhaps the most stunning feature of the film is the dark, ambient, gloomy atmosphere hovering over this strange, tragic little town. In between each blunt object to the head and soupy human stew, one feels completely at ease which makes the hard-to-stomach surprises all the more effective. A lot of this needs to be credited to Damichi’s progressive, humanized script and Mickle’s impressive camerawork…but even more so to the film’s trio of composers. The soundtrack is smooth and entrancing, never leaving you clawing at your eardrums. An abundance of horror flicks these days go for the ascending screech or ominous semitones, but not here. This is music you could listen to while gazing towards a skyline or a breathtaking night sky, hell, even when you’re trying to doze off…and in no way is this a bad thing.

As impressive and hypnotic as all the technical and behind-the-scenes mumbo-jumbo is, it’d be nothing without the right cast. “We Are What We Are” has a strong, invested, talented ensemble across the board featuring Bill Sage, Julia Garner, Ambyr Childers, Michael Parks, and Kelly McGillis. Without question, Bill Sage steals the show here. He’s intimidating, ruthless, and his emotional spectrum ranges from stoic to uncontrollable grief. One of the best performances in a horror flick I’ve ever seen, he’s just an absolute beast. Ambyr Childers gives the performance of her young career, something to be truly proud of as a calling card. Apart from Sage, Childers is the striking scene stealer. Julia Garner does a superlative job in her supporting role. The young actress, who’s starred in a couple of indie-hits and looks to have some mainstream success in the near future, easily gives the most vulnerable, emotional compromised performance.

We Are What We Are (2013)

Amazingly performed, atmospheric, and deliciously satisfying, “We Are What We Are” is a visual feast (no pun intended).

We Are What We Are: 8.5 out of 10.

About [email protected]

Aspiring writer who absolutely adores film and television. thecinemamonster.com

Posted on November 5, 2013, in Horror and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 21 Comments.

  1. Interesting Joseph. I’ve not heard much about this but it sounds…erm…interesting. ;)

    • Lol, thanks Mark. What’s so…interesting (as you elegantly put it) about this flick is that even if you don’t like horror, I’d still recommend you watch this. Yes, it’s based on a terrifying premise and it has moments of violence and gore, but it’s so beautiful and character driven that it’s easy to brace and understand the chaos.

  2. Sounds good! Can’t wait : )

  3. Nicely done mate. A film I wanted to catch but went before I got chance to see it. Will need to go looking for it.

  4. This is one of those films where I try to explain to people why I want to see it and end up sounding extremely weird. Great review!

  5. I saw this at Fantastic Fest — I am actually going to be doing a comparison of this remake and the original on my blog :). I absolutely loved this film–it was so beautifully shot and well acted that it felt so much deeper than your traditional horror film. It is something altogether special–a great addition to the genre.

  6. Glad you enjoyed this one as much as I did. Truly fantastic, and what a finish. I agree about Sage, simply amazing. Worth seeing just for him alone.

  7. Great analysis on cannibalism, and review. Very intrigued about this one, as I LOVED the original.

    • Thanks Fernando! Definitely check this one out when you can, easily one of the best horror films of the year, possibly one of the best films in any genre. I’m a little worried to check out the original, I’ve heard some negative things, but now that you loved it, I’ll definitely give it a watch! By the way, your Guest List is going up this Friday, is that okay?

  8. Erm… Nice review! But I’ll probably skip it. ;-) Actually – I didn’t know this had been remade. I did think the original sounded… Interesting…

  9. Great review Joseph! This movie was a really, really good one and I enjoyed it a hell of a lot.

  1. Pingback: The Gushing Cinephile: December 16, 2013 | The Cinema Monster

  2. Pingback: WE ARE WHAT WE ARE (2013) FOUR BIG TIME TOP HATS | Isaacs Picture Conclusions

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 603 other followers

%d bloggers like this: