Nymphomaniac: Volume 2 (2014)

Warning: This review contains content, images, and language that may upset and/or offend some readers. Reader discretion is advised.

nymphomaniac-volume-2

One thing that Lars Von Trier’s “Nymphomaniac” films are adamant in conveying to and exerting from the viewer is the ability to look at everything from a different point of view, no matter how difficult or uncomfortable it may be at times. Something you wouldn’t expect from a film who’s content is so universally opinionated to one side like sex addiction, pedophillia, extreme BDSM, etc… Nevertheless, Trier’s latest outing topples this feat surprisingly easily, much to the bewildered amazement of cinephiles everywhere, including myself. Although, I’m sure there will be an avalanche of backlash regarding the film’s unrestrained visuals and themes, not to mention the stance it takes on the aforementioned matters from prudes, over-protective parents, and so on. That being said, “Nymphomaniac” as a whole is quite the eye-opener and should resonate with mature, intelligent beings.

nymphomaniac604-tt-width-604-height-410

Look, I’m not condoning sex with children, and the film isn’t either. It’s simply providing varying vantage points, giving an intelligent, thought-out counterargument to topics that don’t receive much opposition. For example. We as a species, a compassionate, smart, understanding, evolving society have come to accept homosexuality as something that one is born with, a genetic tendency that the host has no control over. So, can’t the same be said for someone who is sexually attracted to prepubescent beings? Or for those who can’t help but be sexually stimulated by violence?

Clearly having relations with someone under the age of consent is wrong, and the same could be said for asphyxiation, unreciprocated desire for intercourse, simulated or not, and partaking in violent stimulation. So what are these people to do when they have no say in the matter? Obviously and irrefutably we cannot have pedophiles and murderers running lose, so do we continue down this path? Lock them up, end their existence and suffering, wait for natural selection to take its course? This is what “Nymphomaniac” is presenting. An alternative way of seeing through the dark.

nymphomaniac-volume-2-1

“Perhaps the only difference between me and other people is that I’ve always demanded more from the sunset. More spectacular colors when the sun hit the horizon. That’s perhaps my only sin.” – Jo.

Undoubtedly my favourite line from the film. This quote really drives home the notion that we should all look at our lives differently. We see our existence as this miracle, a gift that gives even at its most darkest. But, why should we not expect more out of life and living? As Jo says, “more spectacular colours.” Shouldn’t everything be infinitely fulfilling? I’m not talking about excess, I’m talking about every moment in one’s life being boundlessly splendid. We only get a finite amount of minutes living in a body with a character and personality unlike any other, so why not comprise them of something that satisfies you fully, whatever that may be. Part ways with the notion of work, government, and materialism, do whatever makes you ooze with joy…no matter how unique or unsavoury.

nymphomaniac

With volume 1, Trier was very much focused on the minuscule, personal aspects of fulfillment and living. The idea that sharing one’s life with another gives us a disillusioned purpose…something more than simply being a brief second in our species reproductive cycle towards the goal…ultimate, infallible evolution. In volume 2, Trier broadens the scale and takes our insignificance to the universal level and really tries to hammer home the irrefutable truth: sex is the driving force of our race and loneliness is inevitable. And sadly, Trier’s view of existence and humanity, is the truth. This has been present throughout all his films and his latest rings strongest. It’s a harsh reality and I know a lot of you won’t want to hear it…believe it, but, it’s something that can’t be refuted or undone. It is what it is, we are what we are, there’s nothing to do but live a thoroughly and utterly enjoyable life while you can.

nymphomaniac-part-2-the-nymphomaniac-part-2-29-01-2014-11-g

In volume 1, Stacy Martin was the driving force while Charlotte Gainsbourg took the backseat, so to speak. The roles reverse in volume 2 and Gainsbourg puts to rest any criticism naysayers would have slung in her direction had she faltered under the immense demands and pressure of Trier’s latest. Whether she’s fully clothed having an intellectual conversation with a newly found friend or taking a vicious beating half-naked just to achieve an epic, heavenly, godly orgasm, Gainsbourg holds the screen and audiences attention as if she had a gun held to the head of the world. Another outstanding performance on her end further proves that her lack of use in other films is incomprehensible.

Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of “Nymphomaniac” is Stellan Skarsgard’s character Seligman. Without question, an intelligent, compassionate loner who can’t help but blend into the background. Yet, as time progresses, we can’t help but start to slowly shift focus from Gainsbourg’s characters story to his life, experiences and environment. I don’t want to give too much away, but do pay close attention to Skarsgard’s brilliance here. His character arguably becomes our antihero just as much as Gainsbourg’s character does. I don’t think I’ve seen a protagonist so intriguing. Our admiration, respect, and love for this character changes so quickly, if you blink, you might miss it.

The film also stars Jamie Bell, who having recently won even more praise from me for his role in “Snowpiercer” continues to shine blindingly with another unforgettable turn in “Nymphomaniac.” Willem Dafoe and Mia Goth round out the supporting cast, with those who were present in volume such as Shia LaBeouf and Stacy Martin making brief appearances as well.

nymphomaniac-vol-1-lrg2

If I could leave you with one last tidbit of advice, watch the film as a whole, not in two separate volumes. I know it’s tough to sit through a four-hour film, but I promise it’s worth the effort. Trier’s visuals are as unflinching, striking and reprehensible as ever. The film is filled with philosophical theories and moral quandaries, not to mention the stellar performances from the entire ensemble. “Nymphomaniac” is another triumph for Trier and company, one that is sure to leave you pondering its construction and meaning well after the final credits role.

Nymphomaniac: Volume II: 9 out of 10.

About Joseph@thecinemamonster

Aspiring writer who absolutely adores film and television. thecinemamonster.com

Posted on April 1, 2014, in Drama and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 38 Comments.

  1. I watched these over the weekend…. I’m trying to get my thoughts out for Monday : )

    Glad you liked it so much!

  2. Fabulous work, Joseph! Great to see that we’re on the same page with this one. This is an outstanding achievement from von Trier and one that will be hard pushed when finding another film all year that’s as thought provoking or as brave. You all set for the Danish 5 1/2 hour version now? ;)

  3. Wow, well glad you enjoyed it, I gave this one 2/10 – at least volume 1 was somewhat watchable. Jaime Bell’s scenes truly had to be seen to be believed in this one.

  4. I liked Antichrist so I’ll give this a go. You make it sound really interesting

  5. I really hated Antichrist so I’m staying far away from these two but it is good to see you enjoyed them.

  6. I need to see both these films purely because I want to see what the fuss is about. If nothing else, Von Trier doesn’t half make you intrigued as to what he’s made.

  7. Excellent, excellent Joseph. I am *very* intrigued to see this now.

  8. I keep hearing about this, I need to see it! I like weird movies like this, good review.

  9. Though both films are still digesting in my mind, you make a lot of interesting points regarding Volume II. Seeing them both back-to-back in the theatre, I felt that Volume II was the weaker of the two. Not bad per say, in fact I enjoyed both films, but some sections seemed to lag for me when thinking about the film as a whole…still, as you point out, Skarsgard was the glue that held it together for me. He nicely encapsulate everything that Gainsbourgh has been saying about mankind and sexuality. Von Trier hits another one out of the park. One of the most daring filmmakers working today.

  10. Great review, it seems Jamie Bell has come a long way since Billy Elliot. Especially from what I’ve heard about his role in the movie.

  11. Another fantastic review Joseph. Though honestly, the more I think about this the more I am thinking I am not going to be watching them… just not really my scene.

  12. Finally saw 2 last night! Skarsgard and Gainsbourg are so good. Now I am sitting here trying to piece it all together in my head. Such an interesting movie that makes you think.

  13. I was able to see part 1 in theaters but part 2 was pulled pretty fast from theaters so I never got the chance to watch it. I will plan on watching both movies together hopefully soon

  1. Pingback: NYMPHOMANIAC VOLUMES 1 AND 2 (2014) | Isaacs Picture Conclusions

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 504 other followers

%d bloggers like this: